DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
HCG
Docket No. NR5495-14 |
15 Jan 15
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
14 January 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC memo 1070 JPL/kal dated 6
November 2014, a copy of which is attached.
After careful. and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the -
Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish
the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this
connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
within one year from the date of the Board’s decision. New evidence is
evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its
decision in your case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Docket No. NRS495-14
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of:
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure: HOMC memo 1070 JPL/kal dtd 6 Nov 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4499 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval ord and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR4499-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3276 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3276-14 rrection of an official naval Consequentiy, when applying for a co demonstrate the existence De record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3418 14
COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1007 oe, ae ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JET Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board ‘prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2618 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1070 MIQ dated 23 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3705 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted cf your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ble material error or injustice. year from the date of the Board's decision.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1272 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1070 MMRP-13 of 5 May 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7887 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQOMC Memo 1070 MMRP-13 of 20 May 14, a copy of which is attached. NR7887-13 naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8783 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1070 MIQ dated 18 March 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8814 13
B three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6982 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...